Most employees in the US are in “at-will” arrangements, giving them the impression that their managers can terminate them for any reason. While companies certainly have broad discretion when hiring and managing employees, they’re certainly not free to do whatever they like. This is because many employment standards and regulations are in place to ensure that employees aren’t terminated for retaliatory, discriminatory, or malicious reasons.
The Legal Parameters of At-Will Employment
At-will employment is usually a preferred choice for companies because it offers employers and employees a degree of flexibility. Still, it is in no way powerful enough to eliminate any rights that an employee has.
Many regulations and laws prohibit companies from terminating employees without a valid reason. For instance, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Federal laws, such as the Civil Rights Act ensure that no employee is terminated based on protected characteristics, such as gender, race, religion, or disability.
Beyond statutory protections, the type of workplace relationship an employee shares with the company also makes a difference. For instance, in many areas, employers add a guarantee in the employee manual about a certain situation, which serves as an implied contract and can alter the status of an “at-will” employee.
This means that if an individual can demonstrate that their employer guaranteed a specific disciplinary process and failed to follow it when they were fired, the termination may provide the basis for a lawsuit. As a result, employees can recognize when a firing may be unlawful when they’re trained to look beyond their “at-will” status.
Identifying Red Flags Concerning Termination
Whether or not wrongful termination is indeed the case often comes down to certain behavioral patterns.
For instance:
- One common red flag is temporal proximity, which means being fired shortly after engaging in a protected activity. That’s especially true when an employee is fired shortly after requesting medical leave, lodging a safety complaint, or reporting a case of harassment. In these instances, firing may look like a retaliatory move, which can be questioned legally.
- Yet another common indicator of pretext is a sudden change in the reason for the dismissal. If a company initially cites budget cuts as the reason for dismissing an employee but later claims performance issues, these inconsistencies often indicate a hidden discriminatory practice. Employees can scrutinize these changing narratives and may even have a solid case for wrongful termination.
- Disparate treatment is another red flag. If a terminated employee was punished for a certain offense but no other employees were similarly affected for the same offense, this behavior may be used to establish discrimination. The courts often consider the treatment of different employees based on their protected status before reaching a verdict.
Organizational Consistency and Culture
A lawful working environment depends heavily on how consistently policies are explained and implemented. If policies are applied selectively among different sections of people, legal issues are bound to arise in employment decisions. For instance, when a manager is strict about attendance policies for some people and lenient for others, it may provide grounds for establishing discriminatory behavior.
Good organizations try to mitigate this problem by training managers properly and documenting records effectively. Managers should always rely on objective, measurable metrics when hiring or firing employees rather than personal opinions and emotions. Clear communication about job responsibilities helps distinguish between poor performance and discrimination. But when these elements are absent, it’s rather easy to mistake a business decision for illegal termination.
Endnote
The at-will rule gives the employer flexibility, but it doesn’t protect them against illegal actions. Employees must know their rights and look for mistakes in the process to easily judge whether a termination decision is fair or not. That’s when knowing certain red flags makes it easier to identify the difference between a tough business decision and a legal violation.
About The Author
